Greiling Spells Out Obama's Immigration Policy Shift
What do you think of the President's policy change? Tell us in the comments below.
Editor's note: State Rep. Mindy Greiling, DFL-Roseville, on Friday issued the following email update to constituents:
"Last Friday (June 15), President Obama announced a change in U.S. immigration policy. There is much controversy about our immigration laws, so I thought it would be helpful to provide some details about the initiative.
Effective immediately, young people who were brought to the United States by their families as children, do not present a risk to national security or public safety, and meet several key criteria will be eligible for some relief from fear of removal from the country. Those who demonstrate that they meet the criteria will be eligible to receive deferred action for a period of two years, subject to renewal. The key criteria are as follows:
- Came to the United States under the age of sixteen;
- Have continuously resided in the United States for a least five years preceding the date of this memorandum and are present in the United States on the date of this memorandum;
- Are currently in school, have graduated from high school, have obtained a general education development certificate, or are honorably discharged veterans of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States;
- Have not been convicted of a felony offense, a significant misdemeanor offense, multiple misdemeanor offenses, or otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety;
- Are not above the age of thirty
I believe that the key issue with this policy is that it is focused on young people, who have lived in this country much of their lives despite being brought here illegally by their families. Some have grown up to become valedictorians of their class and many have gone on to college or served in our military.
I believe this new policy gives many young people a powerful reason to stay in school and complete their education.
As we continue to slowly emerge from the economic recession, our country and state will certainly benefit from the willingness of these young people to contribute to our economic prosperity and success.
You can read more on this by visiting the following website: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/06/15/deferred-action-process-certain-young-people-smart-and-sensible-immigration-policy
As always, I encourage you to contact me with your ideas and suggestions. You can reach me at 651-296-5387 and rep.mindy.greiling@house.mn."
Paul Lareau
9:45 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012
The truly sad thing about this whole issue is that this "Immigration Policy Shift" should never have had to be implemented by backdoor means. Not if the US was still a rational, democratic, and still governable country. In the face of an emotional, religously- & racially-tainted, and unbelievably polarized and irrationally extreme positions held by a majority of Americans (on this and many other issues), we are told that we MUST compromise if we are to survive as a nation. The provisions of the Dream Act and this current subset of conditions are as middle-of-the-road a compromise as we could ever hope to find between the "total amnesty for all" and the "build a wall with gun turrets & shoot trespassers" believers. They very specifically and rationally address most of the most deeply held fears and desired benefits of both sides. Yet, as soon as one side brings up this kind of compromise, it is immediately tagged as a "minor rewording" of the "other side's horrendous plan" and rejected out-of-hand. Was the unique notion of American style democracy really an unrealistic dream not possible for long-term human implementation?
Scott Carlson
11:42 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Paul, it is sad that so much of politics is polarized with a my way or the highway" attitude. What do other folks think?